We thought it helpful for clients to have set out what actual Natural England requirements are for licencing – how old your survey can be – and how many surveys are necessary.
Natural England guidance
Natural England guidance on presently acceptable levels of survey effort is set out in their EPSL method statement form – which we present below – slightly tweaked. This sets out both the type and age of data viewed as acceptable. You can use the filters to find your project type.
This is our Excel table here : Great crested – survey effort and age
Deconstructing this gives some interesting insights about the age of data required, but also whether as to whether a full six surveys or repeat surveys are necessary.
Low impact licences and survey data
If we read through this table, you will find that low impact or temporary development can often use presence/absence data alone, which makes sense. You may only need four instead of six visits ( or possibly only one if you find them first time ! ). Newt numbers decline rapidly away from ponds ( either the creatures are too unfit or simply due to dispersion effects ). The effect a long way from ponds can therefore be predicted as being low, based on their presence alone. Far enough away and you can assume de minimus effects, and possibly avoid surveys all together.
The age of data is based on spring/summer survey seasons elapsed ( but see also later for a potential complexity here ):
|Survey done||Age of survey (before May[?] 2015)
|March to May 2015||0 (before May 15)|
So this year, data from the 2011 summer season is 4 years old, assuming you apply before end of May[?] 2015. This also means that for some low impact schemes, older data will be helpful. There are various caveats to this.
It is not 100% clear from the footnote on the NE guidance whether the age of the survey is the number of survey seasons missed, inclusive or exclusive of the present year. It would seem more logical that 2015 data is 0 years old until March 2016, but in fact it appears to be 1 after May this year. However it would be impossible to survey, get planning and apply in the time period. We will take this point up with Natural England for clarity [ thanks to someone for pointing this out to me ].
What survey effort is most helpful ?
This raises for us an interesting question about proportionality and efficiency – what solution for survey effort allows most accurate information most efficiently ?
Given that most ponds are in the small or medium range and that large counts are generally from aggregation across ponds, should we focus more on the number of ponds involved and their functional nature ?
eDNA difficulties for presence/abscence
A difficulty of eDNA for results is that it shows us nothing of the pond’s function.
Four nocturnal visits will not only give a very good guide for impact assessment, but also should generally reveal if the animals are breeding successfully and may turn up eggs or efts dependant on timing.
Many ponds around a breeding pond have occasional newts, but are not of high enough quality for breeding – this issue was never tackled by HSI. Vice versa large numbers of males lecking at a pond indicate one thing. Knowledge about successful breeding at a pond seems to us essential in stating the effects on the population.
So to return to the question only four surveys with presence or possibly even eDNA to prove absence could be sufficient for your needs, or you may be able to rely on existing older data. However really your consultant needs to have some understanding of population ecology to advise you on mitigation and obtaining a licence. Following guidance verbatim is not a good solution and could waste your money – sorry that slipped out.
With this in mind we advise you not to rely on this article for formal advice, but let us discuss with you how it applies to your suituation – please contact us directly if you have a licencing query or you have some observations about the article.
There is more Natural England advice on their website : https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/great-crested-newts-apply-for-a-mitigation-licence